3.8 Article

Proposal of a Recommended Correspondence Method for Companies and Organizations in Case of Partial Rupture of the Nankai Trough Earthquake

期刊

JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 217-232

出版社

FUJI TECHNOLOGY PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.20965/jdr.2023.p0217

关键词

Nankai Trough Earthquake; the case of partial rupture; companies and organizations; responses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence rate of subsequent earthquakes is projected to be a hundred times higher than normal when the Nankai Trough Earthquake experiences partial rupture. Companies and organizations that play important roles in social activities should cooperate and take feasible actions. The recommended responses would vary based on the level of influence from the subsequent partial rupture earthquake.
The occurrence rate of a subsequent earthquake is es-timated to become a hundred times more than that at ordinary times when a case of partial rupture of the Nankai Trough Earthquake occurs. Companies and organizations that play a key role in social activ-ities should take practicable actions positively in co-operation with relevant actors. Their recommended correspondences would be different by area accord-ing to the influence level by the subsequent partial rupture earthquake. Areas would be classified into three types: 1) strong earthquakes and tsunami are anticipated, 2) strong earthquakes without tsunami are anticipated, and 3) neither strong earthquakes nor tsunami is anticipated (this area should contribute as a supporter). There is also difference depending on business character and industry type. Therefore, it would be effective to examine the responses in the case of partial rupture, counting these differences in, and based on their business continuity plans (BCP). The authors will propose a recommended correspon-dence method (recipe) as an example of this means. In addition, there should be recommended actions of companies and organizations such as their operations not preventing evacuation and stockpiling in the local communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据