4.2 Article

Diversity on the edge: non-linear patterns of coral community structure at an isolated oceanic island

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 546, 期 -, 页码 61-74

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11657

关键词

Abundance; Christmas Island; Cliff-edge effect; Community ecology; Diversity; Habitat complexity; Indian Ocean

资金

  1. AIMS-CSIRO-UWA Fellowship
  2. Woodside Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coral communities are expected to display predictable patterns of diversity and structure across depth and exposure gradients, yet these predictions have rarely been tested at oceanic locations. Here we tested 5 common ecological predictions about coral community structure at the remote Chrismas Island in the eastern Indian Ocean. Our results suggest that not all of the predictions hold true at this oceanic location, primarily because the community is structured in non-linear ways. Each surveyed depth zone (5, 12, 20 m) supported a distinctive community, yet species diversity and coral abundance did not show the expected linear increase with depth. Habitat complexity was also shown to respond non-linearly with depth, with the highest habitat complexity occurring in the intermediate 12 m zone. We discuss the 'cliff-edge effect' as a possible explanation for the high diversity and abundance of corals at 20 m, while physical stress and competitive exclusion may explain the low diversity at 12 m. The cliff-edge habitat provides a narrow zone in between the wave-swept shallows and the low light/high shade environment of the steep outer reef walls, and this zone of heterogeneous environmental conditions supports a wide diversity of corals. If future storm events, bleaching, disease or predator outbreaks were to impact the corals living in the cliff-edge habitat, this may have a disproportionate impact on the coral reef community as a whole. Monitoring the status of corals on the cliff edge is important for understanding and predicting how oceanic reef systems will be affected by climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据