3.8 Article

Data-driven approach to prioritize residential buildings' retrofits in cold climates using smart thermostat data

期刊

ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 172-186

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2023.2193164

关键词

Retrofit; Residential buildings; thermal performance; Classification Model; Data-Driven grey-box models; Real-time measurements; smart thermostat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce energy consumption, it is crucial to retrofit existing buildings as 65% of them will still be in use by 2050. However, evaluating their thermal performance for prioritizing retrofits can be cost-prohibitive on a large scale. This study proposes a data-driven framework that uses smart thermostat data to target buildings for retrofits. Validation of the framework was done using real-time measurements from 60,000 homes across North America. The results can be used to prioritize buildings for retrofits when limited information is available.
At least 65% of existing residential buildings will still be in use by 2050, thus retrofitting existing buildings is critical to reducing energy consumption. However, prioritizing building retrofits typically requires a thorough evaluation of their thermal performance, which can be cost-prohibitive, especially on a large scale. To this end, this study presents a data-driven framework to target buildings for retrofits using smart thermostat data. To validate the framework, it was applied to 60,000 homes across North America using four years of real-time measurements. First, grey-box modelling approaches were used to estimate the thermal time constant for each home. Homes were then clustered according to their estimated values and for each cluster, the priority of retrofit was ranked. Finally, a classification model was developed to predict the priority of retrofit. Using a large sample size, the results can be used to prioritize buildings for retrofits when limited information is available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据