3.8 Article

What is a Smart Destination in Practice? The Interpretation of DMO Managers from Spanish World Heritage Cities

期刊

TOURISM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2023.2214123

关键词

Smart destinations; World Heritage Cities; Destination Management Organizations; Smart Tourism Cities; Spanish World Heritage Cities Group; COVID-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the interpretation and implementation of the Smart Destination Spanish Model in Spanish World Heritage Cities (SWHC). The model, sponsored by the Spanish public administration, has been introduced as a new paradigm of tourist management. Qualitative methods including documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews were used, and destination managers from SWHC and an executive from SEGITTUR were interviewed. The results highlight the momentum gained by the model, especially accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, and identify the strategies implemented.
This work intends to identify how Spanish World Heritage Cities (SWHC) are interpreting and implementing the Smart Destination Spanish Model (SD). The model has been created as a new paradigm of tourist management, and it is being sponsored by the Spanish public administration in different destinations, including Spanish World Heritage Cities. SWHC are historic, major tourist destinations with a large number of visitors. A sequence of qualitative methods has been used, consisting of documentary analysis with semi-structured interviews. The destination managers from each of the 15 cities that take part of the World Heritage Cities Spanish Group have been interviewed. In addition, an executive of the government-owned Tourism Innovation and Technologies company (SEGITTUR) has been also interviewed. The results do highlight the momentum that the model has reached, accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, and serve to identify what kind of strategies have been put in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据