4.5 Article

Estimating inter-regional mobility during disruption: Comparing and combining different data sources

期刊

TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 93-105

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.005

关键词

Human mobility; Travel demand estimation; Origin-destination matrix; Road traffic data; Mobile phone data; Mobility models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of multiple data sources, including mobile phones, road traffic sensors, and companies like Google and Facebook, to model mobility patterns and estimate mobility flows in Finland before and during the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. The results show that the model combining past baseline from mobile phone data with up-to-date road traffic data achieves the highest accuracy, followed by radiation and gravity models augmented with traffic data. The findings highlight the usefulness of publicly available road traffic data in mobility modeling and pave the way for a data fusion approach to estimating mobility flows.
A quantitative understanding of people's mobility patterns is crucial for many applications. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate mobility, in particular during disruption such as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we investigate the use of multiple sources of data from mobile phones, road traffic sensors, and companies such as Google and Facebook in modelling mobility patterns, with the aim of estimating mobility flows in Finland in early 2020, before and during the disruption induced by the pandemic. We find that the highest accuracy is provided by a model that combines a past baseline from mobile phone data with up-to-date road traffic data, followed by the radiation and gravity models similarly augmented with traffic data. Our results highlight the usefulness of publicly available road traffic data in mobility modelling and, in general, pave the way for a data fusion approach to estimating mobility flows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据