The influence of social comparison on risk decision-making for self and groups in intergroup contexts

Objective The current study aims to explore the influence of social comparison on risk decision-making for self and for groups in intergroup contexts. Method Two experiments with the within-subjects design of 2 (social comparison: upward comparison, downward comparison) x 3 (decision-maker role: for me, for us, for them) were conducted in this study. Experiment 1 focused on the ingroup contexts, and experiment 2 focused on the outgroup contexts. Results (1) in outgroup contexts, individuals are more risk-seeking in upward comparison conditions than in downward comparison conditions. However, the difference disappears in ingroup contexts. (2) Making decisions for them is riskier than making decisions for me and for us with no significant differences between the latter two and consistent across intergroup contexts. (3) The difference in risk decisions made amid upward and downward comparisons is amplified for decisions made for groups. Conclusion The findings may support the selective accessibility model and provide an interpretation with responsibility alleviation for self-group differences in risk decision-making.

Automated summary

The current study examines the influence of social comparison on risk decision-making for self and for groups in intergroup contexts. The findings reveal that individuals are more risk-seeking in upward comparison conditions than in downward comparison conditions in outgroup contexts, but this difference disappears in ingroup contexts. Making decisions for them is riskier than making decisions for me and for us, and this pattern is consistent across intergroup contexts. These findings may support the selective accessibility model and provide an interpretation with responsibility alleviation for self-group differences in risk decision-making.