4.2 Article

The Association between Religiosity and Fertility Intentions Via Grandparenting: Evidence from GGS Data

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10680-023-09652-9

关键词

Religiosity; Grandparental childcare; Fertility intentions; European countries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the relationship between religiosity and fertility intentions, focusing on the role of grandparental childcare as a mediating or moderating factor. The study finds a positive effect of religious attendance on fertility intentions, with regular or weekly help from grandparents strengthening this association, especially for male respondents and the intention to have a second child.
Although the literature concerning the association between religiosity and fertility in European countries is already quite extensive, studies exploring the mechanisms of action of religiosity are rare. The main aim of this article is to investigate whether grandparental childcare is a mediating or moderating variable in the association between attendance at religious services and the intention to have a second or third child. Building on previous literature, we assume that parents who are more religious might put more effort into establishing a positive relation with the grandparents of their child/children. Consequently, compared to parents who are less religious, those who are more religious could be more receptive to possible encouragement from grandparents to have another child and may be more optimistic regarding grandparents' involvement with an additional child. Using Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) data for eleven European countries, we find evidence of a strong and positive effect of attendance at religious services on fertility intentions. Receipt of regular or weekly help from grandparents positively moderates the association between attendance at religious services and fertility intentions, albeit only for male respondents and mainly for the intention to have a second child.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据