4.7 Article

The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption

期刊

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 1235-1258

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2173

关键词

government subsidies; green technology adoption; newsvendor; cost of uncertainty; supply chain coordination

资金

  1. MIT Energy Initiative
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1162034]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1162034] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies government subsidies for green technology adoption while considering the manufacturing industry's response. Government subsidies offered directly to consumers impact the supplier's production and pricing decisions. Our analysis expands the current understanding of the price-setting newsvendor model, incorporating the external influence from the government, who is now an additional player in the system. We quantify how demand uncertainty impacts the various players (government, industry, and consumers) when designing policies. We further show that, for convex demand functions, an increase in demand uncertainty leads to higher production quantities and lower prices, resulting in lower profits for the supplier. With this in mind, one could expect consumer surplus to increase with uncertainty. In fact, we show that this is not always the case and that the uncertainty impact on consumer surplus depends on the trade-off between lower prices and the possibility of underserving customers with high valuations. We also show that when policy makers such as governments ignore demand uncertainty when designing consumer subsidies, they can significantly miss the desired adoption target level. From a coordination perspective, we demonstrate that the decentralized decisions are also optimal for a central planner managing jointly the supplier and the government. As a result, subsidies provide a coordination mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据