4.1 Article

Multi-Level Factors Associated with Relationship-Centred and Task-Focused Mealtime Practices in Long-Term Care: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes Study

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0714980823000156

关键词

Aging; relationship-centred care; task-focused practices; mealtimes; long-term care; quality of care; eating challenges

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mealtimes in long-term care (LTC) can reinforce relationships between staff and residents through relationship-centred care (RCC) practices, but are often task-focused (TF). This study explores the contextual factors that contribute to RCC and TF mealtime practices. Data from 32 Canadian LTC homes showed a higher average of RCC practices per meal compared to TF practices. The study found that factors at the resident, dining room, and home levels influenced RCC and TF scores. Addressing these factors can reinforce RCC practices and reduce TF practices.
Mealtimes in long-term care (LTC) can reinforce relationships between staff and residents through relationship-centred care (RCC) practices; however, meals are often task-focused (TF). This cross-sectional study explores multi-level contextual factors that contribute to RCC and TF mealtime practices. Secondary data from residents in 32 Canadian LTC homes were analyzed (n = 634; mean age 86.7 +/- 7.8; 31.1% male). Data included resident health record review, standardized mealtime observation tools, and valid questionnaires. A higher average number of RCC (9.6 +/- 1.4) than TF (5.6 +/- 2.1) practices per meal were observed. Multi-level regression revealed that a significant proportion of variation in the RCC and TF scores was explained at the resident- (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC](RCC) = 0.736; ICCTF = 0.482), dining room- (ICCRCC = 0.210; ICCTF = 0.162), and home- (ICCRCC = 0.054; ICCTF = 0.356) levels. For-profit status and home size modified the associations between functional dependency and practices. Addressing multi-level factors can reinforce RCC practices and reduce TF practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据