4.2 Article

Ethnic Variation in Fertility Preferences in Sub-Saharan Africa

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-023-09804-z

关键词

Fertility preferences; Ethnicity; Sub-Saharan Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on the role of ethnicity in shaping fertility preferences in sub-Saharan Africa has been limited to small-scale studies, hindering understanding of overall effects. This study offers a comparative analysis of preferred family size among ethnic groups in the region. The data from 500,000 women in 24 countries reveal significant variations in fertility preferences, influenced by gender-related cultural characteristics and education. The findings emphasize the importance of considering ethnicity when examining fertility patterns and designing relevant policies.
Research focusing on the role of ethnicity in shaping fertility preferences in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has been largely restricted to small-scale studies within specific groups, regions or countries, which makes it difficult to gain insight into the overall effects of ethnicity on fertility in the region. This study provides a broad comparative analysis of the variation in preferred family size among ethnic groups covering the whole SSA subcontinent. The relationship between ethnicity and family size preferences is analyzed for 500,000 women from 181 ethnic groups in 24 sub-Saharan countries using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys and via multilevel Poisson regression analyses. Fertility preferences vary considerably across ethnic groups. Major factors explaining this are gender-related cultural characteristics and educational level at the group level. Interaction analyses showed that the size and direction of these effects are moderated by the women's individual characteristics. The findings make clear that someone's ethnic background should be taken into account when looking at fertility patterns and designing policies aimed at changing fertility patterns in the SSA context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据