Using Habermas' theory of communicative action to transform sociological analyses of evidence-based policy

Many sociological analyses of evidence-based policy frame it as contributing to the rationalisation of social relations, and being constructed through and implicated in systems of knowledge/power. These analyses are based on social theory placing insufficient emphasis on the emancipatory potential of evidence, and the possibility of rational adjudication of truth claims. We argue sociological engagement with evidence-based policy could be transformed by being informed by the work of Habermas. Habermas' work could enable a more nuanced view of EBP in terms of whether or not this leads to rationalisation in the form of de-politicisation or marginalisation of citizens' voices. Habermas' work on knowledge-constitutive interests could inform a reconstructed view of evidence, disabused of positivist assumptions and with increased emancipatory potential. Habermas' notion of the ideal speech situation as a procedural basis for truth could function as a standard for exploring how EBP is affected by power asymmetries, as well as for adjudicating truth claims.

Automated summary

Many sociological analyses view evidence-based policy as rationalizing social relations and being influenced by systems of knowledge/power. However, these analyses often overlook the emancipatory potential of evidence and the possibility of rational adjudication of truth claims. By incorporating Habermas' work, sociological engagement with evidence-based policy could be transformed by taking into account whether it leads to depoliticization or marginalization of citizens' voices. Habermas' idea of the ideal speech situation as a procedural basis for truth can serve as a standard for exploring power asymmetries and evaluating truth claims in relation to evidence-based policy.