4.1 Article

Homojunction structure amorphous oxide thin film transistors with ultra-high mobility

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEMICONDUCTORS
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/44/5/052101

关键词

thin film transistors; homojunction; carrier mobility; amorphous oxides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AOS have unique advantages in transparent and flexible TFTs, but obtaining higher mu (FE) than LTPS has been difficult. In this study, ZnAlSnO homojunction TFTs were designed to achieve mu (FE) = 113.8 cm(2)/(V center dot s). The device exhibited optimized electrical properties with low off-current, threshold voltage, and subthreshold swing. The homojunction active layer, with a combination of micro-crystallization and carrier suppressor concentration gradient distribution, allowed for reduced off-current and positive shift in threshold voltage while maintaining high field-effect mobility. This research points to a promising direction for high-performance AOS TFTs.
Amorphous oxide semiconductors (AOS) have unique advantages in transparent and flexible thin film transistors (TFTs) applications, compared to low-temperature polycrystalline-Si (LTPS). However, intrinsic AOS TFTs are difficult to obtain field-effect mobility (mu (FE)) higher than LTPS (100 cm(2)/(V center dot s)). Here, we design ZnAlSnO (ZATO) homojunction structure TFTs to obtain mu (FE) = 113.8 cm(2)/(V center dot s). The device demonstrates optimized comprehensive electrical properties with an off-current of about 1.5 x 10(-11) A, a threshold voltage of -1.71 V, and a subthreshold swing of 0.372 V/dec. There are two kinds of gradient coupled in the homojunction active layer, which are micro-crystallization and carrier suppressor concentration gradient distribution so that the device can reduce off-current and shift the threshold voltage positively while maintaining high field-effect mobility. Our research in the homojunction active layer points to a promising direction for obtaining excellent-performance AOS TFTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据