4.3 Article

Dual Mating Strategies Observed in Male Clients of Female Sex Workers

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-023-09439-1

关键词

Dual mating strategy; Male sexual preferences; Pair-bonding; Variety seeking; Sex work

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans have a complex and dynamic mating system. This study explores male use of a dual mating strategy, pursuing both a long-term relationship and short-term, extra-pair copulations. The research found that men desire both pair-bonding and sexual variety, and their preference for one might be predicted by fulfillment of the other. These findings have implications for relationships and provide insight into motivations for male infidelity.
Humans have a complex and dynamic mating system, and there is evidence that our modern sexual preferences stem from evolutionary pressures. In the current paper we explore male use of a dual mating strategy: simultaneously pursuing both a long-term relationship (pair-bonding) as well as short-term, extra-pair copulations (variety-seeking). The primary constraint on such sexual pursuits is partner preferences, which can limit male behavior and hence cloud inferences about male preferences. The aim of this study was to investigate heterosexual male mating preferences when largely unconstrained by female partner preferences. In service of this goal, female full-service sex workers (N = 6) were surveyed on the traits and behaviors of their male clients (N = 516) and iterative cluster analysis was used to identify male mating typologies. Two clusters emerged: clients seeking a pair-bonding experience and clients seeking a variety experience. Results also suggested that romantically committed men were more likely to seek a variety experience than a relationship experience. We conclude that men desire both pair-bonding and sexual variety, and that their preference for one might be predicted by fulfilment of the other. These findings have implications for relationships, providing insight into motivations for male infidelity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据