4.2 Article

Militancy, dictatorship and sites for representation in Rio de la Plata: Museo de la Memoria and Escuela de Mecanica de la Armada

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 493-504

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2023.2201819

关键词

Museums; memory; Argentina; Uruguay; trauma; representations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although Museo de la Memoria in Montevideo and the former Escuela de Mecanica de la Armada (ESMA) in Buenos Aires deal with similar themes of dictatorship, social mobilization, repression, and the return to democracy in the Southern Cone, they present contrasting depictions. The planning for both sites took place in the 21st century, drawing on new political proposals focused on memory recovery. A comparative analysis of the sites is timely, considering the differences in exhibits, government-sponsored memories, state agencies, and other social groups' roles.
Though they deal with a similar time period and share similar aims, Museo de la Memoria in Montevideo and what was formerly Escuela de Mecanica de la Armada (the Naval Mechanics School, or ESMA) in Buenos Aires present contrasting depictions of dictatorship, social mobilization, repression, and the return to democracy in the Southern Cone. The planning for both sites took place in the 21st century, drawing on new and more progressive political proposals with a focus on the issues associated with recovering memory. A comparative analysis of the sites, then, seems timely. The differences in the two sites are related to not only the exhibits themselves but to the role of government-sponsored memories, state agencies, and other social groups. There are similarities between the exhibits at MUME and the former ESMA, both of which gloss over the violence exercised by those who fought against the regime. At the same time, some degree of political indoctrination can be seen in the curatorial representation of this conflictive period at both institutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据