4.1 Article

Current knowledge regarding Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease in Mexico: a systematic review

期刊

SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 175-185

出版社

INST NACIONAL SALUD PUBLICA
DOI: 10.21149/14020

关键词

Trypanosoma cruzi; Chagas disease; Triatominae; original research; Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to systematize, evaluate, and synthesize specific research on the zoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, its vectors, and Chagas disease (CD) in Mexico. A total of 1,410 original research articles were identified, and 659 were selected for technical evaluation, with 221 rated as the highest quality. Despite the significant increase in knowledge generated in the last two decades in Mexico, evidence gaps remain for public healthcare policy to effectively address, prevent, and control CD in the country.
Objective. Systematize, evaluate and synthesize specific research for Mexico on the zoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, its vectors (Triatominae: Hemiptera: Reduviidae), and Chagas disease (CD). Materials and methods. Using PRISMA, original research was identified through four search engines, selected using inclusion criteria, assigned to 14 topic areas, and evaluated using technical criteria. Results. 1 410 records were identified and 659 (46.7%) were chosen for technical evaluation, of which 221 (15.7%) were rated as the highest quality. PubMed contributed 95% of the publications, while BibTri, Lilacs and Scielo contributed the remaining 5%. Publication rate was constant between 1950 and 1990, although there was an exponential increase from 1995 to 2020. Publication quality increased from 5.3% of registries in 1990 to 49.8% in 2020. Systemic, economic, anthropological and social aspects of CD in Mexico were the topics least published (8%). Conclusions. Despite the remarkable increase in knowledge generated in the last two decades in Mexico, this systematic review highlights evidence gaps fundamental for public healthcare policy to attend, prevent, and control CD in the country.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据