4.5 Article

Self-gated 4D multiphase, steady-state imaging with contrast enhancement (MUSIC) using rotating cartesian K-space (ROCK): Validation in children with congenital heart disease

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 472-483

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26376

关键词

MR angiography; cardiac CINE; self-gating; pediatric congenital heart disease; motion compensation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL127153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeTo develop and validate a cardiac-respiratory self-gating strategy for the recently proposed multiphase steady-state imaging with contrast enhancement (MUSIC) technique. MethodsThe proposed SG strategy uses the ROtating Cartesian K-space (ROCK) sampling, which allows for retrospective k-space binning based on motion surrogates derived from k-space center line. The k-space bins are reconstructed using a compressed sensing algorithm. Ten pediatric patients underwent cardiac MRI for clinical reasons. The original MUSIC and 2D-CINE images were acquired as a part of the clinical protocol, followed by the ROCK-MUSIC acquisition, all under steady-state intravascular distribution of ferumoxytol. Subjective scores and image sharpness were used to compare the images of ROCK-MUSIC and original MUSIC. ResultsAll scans were completed successfully without complications. The ROCK-MUSIC acquisition took 51 min, compared to 8 +/- 2 min for the original MUSIC. Image scores of ROCK-MUSIC were significantly better than original MUSIC at the ventricular outflow tracts (3.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.6, P<0.05). There was a strong trend toward superior image scores for ROCK-MUSIC in the other anatomic locations. ConclusionROCK-MUSIC provided images of equal or superior image quality compared to original MUSIC, and this was achievable with 40% savings in scan time and without the need for physiologic signal. Magn Reson Med 78:472-483, 2017. (c) 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据