4.3 Article

Alignment of port policy to the context of the Physical Internet

期刊

MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2022.2147594

关键词

Physical Internet (PI); freight transport; ports; policy; scenarios; multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Physical Internet is a paradigm-changing vision that is expected to significantly impact the freight transport and logistics system. However, the uncertainty associated with its development creates challenges for current stakeholders, including ports. This study addresses the lack of research on port policy under uncertain developments towards the Physical Internet by providing insights and recommendations through scenario analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis.
The Physical Internet (PI) is a paradigm-changing and technology-driven vision, which is expected to significantly impact the development of the freight transport and logistics (FTL) system of today. However, the development of the FTL system towards the PI creates much uncertainty for its current stakeholders. Ports are one of those stakeholders that are expected to be profoundly affected by these developments. However, research that focuses on port policy, under the uncertain developments towards the PI, is still lacking. By providing port authorities with insights and recommendations on robust policy areas, we address this void in literature. We conduct a scenario analysis in combination with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to determine the importance of port performance indicators and policy areas in different scenarios. The most significant, uncertain, and orthogonal factors for the development of the PI are technological development and institutional development. We find that for a proper alignment with the PI vision, in three out of four scenarios, ports should prioritize the implementation of digital solutions and standards, as opposed to an infrastructure focused policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据