4.3 Article

'Good jobs', training and skilled immigration

期刊

ECONOMICA
卷 90, 期 359, 页码 851-881

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12472

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a theoretical model and empirical analysis on the relationship between skilled immigration and the training of native-born workers in the UK. The findings show that while there is a small positive association between skilled immigration and native training rates at the aggregate level, the relationship varies depending on the skill level of the immigrant, the skill level of trainees, and the sector into which immigration occurs. The study emphasizes the importance of considering heterogeneous effects from immigration when formulating policy or modeling immigration's effects across the wider economy.
Has skilled immigration into the UK led to a reduction in the training of native-born workers? To address this concern, this paper describes a theoretical model where immigration can affect the training of native-born workers both positively and negatively, and where its effects may differ according to the characteristics of the migrant and of the training firm's sector. It then investigates this issue empirically using UK Labour Force Survey data from 1995 to 2018. At the aggregate level, there is a small positive association between skilled immigration and native training rates. However, a more disaggregated analysis finds that the relationship between immigration and native training depends on the skill level of the immigrant, the skill level of trainees, and the sector into which immigration occurs. In particular, traded goods sectors show a positive association between training of UK-born workers and both unskilled and skilled immigration. In non-traded high-wage sectors, the association between skilled immigration and UK-born training is negative. These findings highlight the importance of allowing for heterogeneous effects from immigration when formulating policy or when modelling immigration's effects across the wider economy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据