The term 'epistemic trespassing' refers to judgments made by individuals outside of their area of expertise. This paper examines expert trespassing testimony, specifically within the scientific community. By making certain distinctions, the author argues that while such trespassing can hinder collaboration, it is not always detrimental and can even be beneficial.
The term 'epistemic trespassing' has recently been coined to denote a person's judgments regarding a domain where they are not epistemic experts. In this paper, I focus on expert trespassing testimony - that is, testimony by an expert in a domain of expertise other than his own. More specifically, I focus on intra-scientific trespassing testimony between scientific collaborators. By developing a number of distinctions, I argue that while intra-scientific trespassing testimony may seriously hamper scientific collaboration, it does not invariably do so and may even be beneficial to it.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据