Use of coercion in mental healthcare services in Nigeria: Service providers' perspective

BackgroundThere is increasing advocacy to reduce coercive practices in mental healthcare. Little research has been done on the topic in developing countries.AimsTo explore what mental health professionals in Nigeria think about coercion, why it is used, and what contextual factors influence its use in mental healthcare services.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were carried out with 16 doctors and 14 nurses from two psychiatric hospitals in two regions of Nigeria. The audio-recorded interviews were analyzed thematically with the aid of MAXQDA software.ResultsThree broad categories relating to the perception of, reasons for, and barriers/facilitators to the use of coercion were derived. Coercion was viewed as being for the best interests of patients, a means to an end, and effective for achieving desired outcomes. Safety was both a reason to use a coercive measure and a deterrent to using specific coercive measures thought to be unsafe. The socio-cultural context, obsolete mental health legislation, staff shortages, and attitudes were factors influencing the use of coercion in mental healthcare.ConclusionCoercion was perceived to be ultimately beneficial in mental health practice. There is need for a new mental health legislation and more resources for mental health care in Nigeria to address the problem of coercion.

Automated summary

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of mental health professionals in Nigeria on the use of coercion, the reasons for its use, and the contextual factors influencing its use. It found that coercion was perceived to be in the best interests of patients and effective for achieving desired outcomes. Factors such as the socio-cultural context, outdated mental health legislation, staff shortages, and attitudes were identified as influencing the use of coercion.