4.7 Article

Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk-return perspective

期刊

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 395-408

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.11.035

关键词

Investor sentiment; New energy companies; Value at risk; COVID-19; Text mining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a Chinese investor sentiment index based on the LSTM deep learning method and investigates its impact on new energy stock returns and VaR behavior before and during COVID-19. The results show that investor sentiment significantly affects stock returns and VaR for both new and traditional energy companies, with a stronger effect in the new energy industry. The effects of investor sentiment have increased during COVID-19, and investors prioritize risk over returns. These findings provide guidance for Chinese small and medium-sized investors to optimize their investment strategies and mitigate losses associated with extreme risks.
The new energy industry is crucial for solving the problem of pollution, and its development requires support from the stock market. This paper proposes a Chinese investor sentiment index based on the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning method, and investigates the effect of investor sentiment on new energy stock returns as well as value at risks (VaR) behavior before and during COVID-19. It also compares these effects on traditional energy companies to identify differences between the new energy and traditional companies. The empirical results show that investor sentiment has significant effects on stock returns and VaR of both new and traditional energy companies but the effects are stronger in the new energy industry. The effects of investor sentiment have increased during COVID-19, and investors pay more attention on risks than returns during COVID-19. These results provide guidance for small and medium-sized investors in China to optimize their investment strategies and alleviate losses associated with extreme risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据