Power, Participation, Payment and Platform: Ethical and Methodological Issues in Recruitment in Qualitative Domestic Abuse Research

PurposeThis paper presents a critical reflection of pertinent methodological and ethical issues associated with qualitative research on domestic abuse, and synthesises existing models of research to provide ethical, practical, and methodological implications.MethodsDrawing on the combined research and front-line experience of the authors it explores four critical areas: power, participation, payment, and platform.ResultsCurrent practices sometimes lack transparency and may perpetuate marginalisation in studies of some with lived experience of domestic violence and abuse which can be considered symbolic violence. There lacks consistency in participant payment, or research on participants' perceptions of payment. The final section addresses challenges of including perpetrators as participants, highlighting the learning that could occur as a result of inclusion, noting the associated risks of perceived collusion or endorsement of harmful behaviour.ConclusionsThis paper contributes to scholarship regarding domestic abuse research through exploration of participation, remuneration, and the unique complexities of domestic abuse perpetrator involvement. We foreground the importance of articulating and managing power dynamics in domestic abuse research, and suggest measures to ensure such dynamics are mitigated successfully to ensure participation is accessible to all. The paper argues for further consideration of payment protocols, and inclusion of the decision-making process in published research. Further it recognises perpetrator exclusion from research can result in victim/survivors being held responsible for raising awareness and developing knowledge of domestic abuse, consequently researchers should consider perpetrator participation where possible. The paper concludes with recommendations for those engaged in domestic violence and abuse research.

Automated summary

This paper critically reflects on the methodological and ethical issues in qualitative research on domestic abuse, and provides implications for ethical, practical, and methodological approaches by synthesizing existing research models. Drawing on research and front-line experience, the paper explores four critical areas: power, participation, payment, and platform. The findings reveal the lack of transparency in current practices, the perpetuation of marginalization in studies on lived experience of domestic violence and abuse, inconsistent participant payment, and the challenges of including perpetrators in research.