4.4 Article

An Early and Unequal Decline: Life Course Trajectories of Cognitive Aging in the United States

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/08982643231184593

关键词

cognitive aging; cognitive decline; life course trajectories; dementia risk; gender; race; ethnicity; and educational disparities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study fills gaps in research on cognitive decline and social disparities related to aging, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. By analyzing data from four large longitudinal studies spanning two decades, we found that cognitive decline begins in the 4th decade of life, gender differences in decline vary with age, and there are persistent disadvantages among non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and those with no college education. We also observed improvement in cognitive function among cohorts born in the 20th century, but widening social inequalities in more recent cohorts.
Objectives Cognitive aging is a lifelong process with implications for Alzheimer's disease and dementia. This study aims to fill major gaps in research on the natural history of and social disparities in aging-related cognitive decline over the life span. Methods We conducted integrative data analysis of four large U.S. population-based longitudinal studies of individuals aged 12 to 105 followed over two decades and modeled age trajectories of cognitive function in multiple domains. Results We found evidence for the onset of cognitive decline in the 4(th) decade of life, varying gender differences with age, and persistent disadvantage among non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and those without college education. We further found improvement in cognitive function across 20(th) century birth cohorts but widening social inequalities in more recent cohorts. Discussion These findings advance an understanding of early life origins of dementia risk and invite future research on strategies for promoting cognitive health for all Americans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据