4.4 Article

Could Lehman Sisters reduce bank risk-taking? International evidence

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12530

关键词

bank risk-taking; board gender diversity; corporate governance; critical mass theory; Lehman Sisters hypothesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using data from 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries. The study finds that greater board gender diversity is associated with lower bank risk-taking, supporting the Lehman Sisters hypothesis. However, this effect is weakened in countries with more hostility towards working women. The study also confirms the critical threshold of three female directors in reducing bank risk-taking, providing international evidence for the critical mass theory.
Research question/issueSince the global financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, board gender diversity has attracted growing attention among academia and policy makers. The Lehman Sisters hypothesis argues for more female representation on bank director boards based on the stereotyped gender gap in risk preference, which has been widely supported by empirical studies on nonfinancial firms. However, due to the constraint of data unavailability, empirical research on board gender diversity and bank risk-taking is relatively scarce and mostly confined to individual developed markets with inconclusive findings. In this paper, we examine the impact of board gender diversity on bank risk-taking using a large hand-collected dataset covering 480 commercial banks across 18 developed and 21 developing countries over the period 2007-2016. Research findings/insightsWe find that lower bank risk-taking is associated with greater board gender diversity, supporting the Lehman Sisters hypothesis in the international context; however, this effect is significantly weakened in countries with more hostile perception toward working women. We also confirm the critical threshold of three female directors to play a significant role in reducing bank risk-taking, providing novel international evidence in support of the critical mass theory from the banking sector. Theoretical/academic implicationsOur findings help to reconcile existing contradictory empirical evidence from different countries by highlighting the importance of cultural effects. Practitioner/policy implicationsWe provide the first international empirical evidence in support of the policies aimed to promote representation of women on director boards, particularly in the banking sector. We confirm that a critical mass number of female directors on a bank board is important to avoid the tokenism problem. In countries with less support toward working women, policy makers also need to work on improving the overall working environment for women in order to achieve the expected outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据