4.7 Article

Effect of Water on the Thermal Transition Observed in Poly(allylamine hydrochloride)-Poly(acrylic acid) Complexes

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 49, 期 19, 页码 7563-7570

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00742

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1312676]
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1312676] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1461202] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, we present the thermal behavior of polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) containing weak polyelectrolytes poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) as influenced by water content and complexation pH. Modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) reveals a glass-transition-like thermal transition (T-tr) that decreases in value with increasing hydration and with decreasing complexation pH. We show the collapse of all T-tr values into a single master curve when plotted against the ratio of water molecules per intrinsic (PAH(+)-PAA(-)) ion pair for all pH values explored. Remarkably, this master curve is linear when the natural log of the water to intrinsic ion pair ratio is plotted against the inverse of T-tr. This strongly indicates that the thermal transition is heavily influenced by water at the intrinsic ion pair site. Other water-solvent mixtures are also explored, for which T-tr appears to depend only on water content, regardless of the added solvent. These results suggest that water plays a dual role in PAH-PAA complex: first by participating in the hydrogen-bonding network within and second by plasticizing the PEC. A hypothesis for the thermal transition is proposed in which hydrated PECs undergo a two-step thermal transition caused by an initial restructuring of the water-polyelectrolyte hydrogen-bonding network, followed by chain relaxation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据