4.2 Article

Nowcasting Daily Population Displacement in Ukraine through Social Media Advertising Data

期刊

POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 231-254

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/padr.12558

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In times of crisis, real-time data mapping population displacements are invaluable for targeted humanitarian response. We leveraged social media data from Facebook's advertising platform in combination with preconflict population data to build a real-time monitoring system to estimate subnational population sizes every day disaggregated by age and sex. The use of social media provided one of the only quantitative estimates of internal displacement in the conflict setting in virtual real time, revealing four distinct displacement patterns.
In times of crisis, real-time data mapping population displacements are invaluable for targeted humanitarian response. The Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, forcibly displaced millions of people from their homes including nearly 6 million refugees flowing across the border in just a few weeks, but information was scarce regarding displaced and vulnerable populations who remained inside Ukraine. We leveraged social media data from Facebook's advertising platform in combination with preconflict population data to build a real-time monitoring system to estimate subnational population sizes every day disaggregated by age and sex. Using this approach, we estimated that 5.3 million people had been internally displaced away from their baseline administrative region in the first three weeks after the start of the conflict. Results revealed four distinct displacement patterns: large-scale evacuations, refugee staging areas, internal areas of refuge, and irregular dynamics. While the use of social media provided one of the only quantitative estimates of internal displacement in the conflict setting in virtual real time, we conclude by acknowledging risks and challenges of these new data streams for the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据