4.7 Article

Effects of Backbone Planarity and Tightly Packed Alkyl Chains in the Donor-Acceptor Polymers for High Photostability

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 49, 期 20, 页码 7844-7856

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01580

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRF - Korea goverment (MSIP) [2015R1A2A1A10055620]
  2. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2015M1A2A2056218]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the NRF - Ministry of Education (NRF-201SR1D1A1A01058493). [NRF-201SR1D1A1A01058493]
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [2E26520] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photostability of donor-acceptor (D-A) polymers remains a critical issue despite recent improvements in the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells. We report the synthesis of three highly photostable polymers (PDTBDT-BZ, PDTBDT-BZF, and PDTBDT-BZF(2)) and their suitability for use in high-performance OPV cells. Under 1 sunlight of illumination in air for 10 h, these polymer films demonstrated remarkably high photostability compared to that of PTB7, a representative polymer in the OPV field. While the PDTBDT-BZ, PDTBDT-BZF, and PDTBDT-BZF2 polymer films maintained 97, 90, and 96% photostability, respectively, a PTB7 film exhibited only 38% photo stability under the same conditions. We ascribed the high photostability of the polymers to both the intrinsically photostable chemical moieties and the dense packing of alkyl side chains and planar backbone polymer chains, which prevents oxygen diffusion into the PDTBDT-BZ films. This work demonstrates the high photostability of planar PDTBDT-BZ series polymers composed of photostable DTBDT and BZ moieties and suggests a design rule to synthesize highly photostable photovoltaic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据