4.2 Article

Microenterprise and home care for older adults in England and Wales: A partial revolution?

期刊

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13658

关键词

ageing; Bourdieu; gender; social care; workforce

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the emergence of self-employed care entrepreneurs in the home care field and the challenges they face due to changes in field structures and altered practices of care. It highlights the role of local state actors, their mobilisation of relevant capital, and the shaping of their habitus in this process. The changes threaten the distribution of capital in the home care field, but for care entrepreneurs, even a partial revolution is better than none at all.
Paid carers play an important role in helping older adults with care needs to remain living in their own homes. This paper examines changes in the home care field, specifically the emergence of self-employed care entrepreneurs ('microentrepreneurs'). To do this, it employs Bourdieu's concepts of field, capital and habitus. Drawing on 105 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders working in home care, the paper describes how the interaction of changes to field structures, and altered practices of care have challenged the taken-for-granted acceptance of traditional, transactional forms of care provision. This process has been highly dependent on local state actors, their ability to mobilise relevant forms of capital and the factors which shaped their habitus. It should be seen within the context of changes to local field structures and the hierarchical classification processes which underpin them. These changes threaten the distribution of capital in the home care field in ways that are beneficial to microentrepreneurs. Bourdieu might categorise these developments as 'partial revolutions', which do not challenge the fundamental axioms of the field. However, for care entrepreneurs, formerly employed as low-paid home-care workers, a revolution that is only partial may be better than none at all.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据