4.7 Article

Tracking policy uncertainty under climate change

期刊

RESOURCES POLICY
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103699

关键词

Climate policy; Uncertainty; Macroeconomic fluctuations; CO2 emissions; Energy market

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change is currently one of the world's most crucial challenges, with inevitable impacts on various sectors. Many countries are taking actions to combat climate change, but there is significant uncertainty in the design and implementation of climate policies. In this study, a Climate Policy Uncertainty index is built for China, India, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and its relationship with economic fluctuations and the fossil fuel industry is analyzed.
Currently, climate change is one of the world's most crucial challenges. Climate risks could have a substantial and inevitable influence on the economic sectors, financial markets, and households. Most countries have pledged to take more actions to combat climate change. However, a significant uncertainty appears in the design and implementation of climate policies, especially in the timetable, magnitude, and anticipated consequences. In other words, it is uncertain what trends in climate policy are changing. Using the textual method, we build a monthly Climate Policy Uncertainty index for China, India, the United States, and the United Kingdom from the period 2000 to 2020. To gain a better understanding of the index, we compare it with other economic and political uncertainty indexes. Considering the close relationship between climate policy and economic activity, we further conduct the Granger Causality test and explore the response of economic fluctuations to the shock from climate policy uncertainty using the Bayesian VAR model. Our empirical results indicate that the uncertainty of climate policy can lead to steady growth of the fossil fuel industry. Finally, some targeted policies are suggested based on the empirical results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据