4.7 Article

Nexus between green finance, environmental degradation, and sustainable development: Evidence from developing countries

期刊

RESOURCES POLICY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103371

关键词

Sustainable development; Green finance; Developing countries; Environmental degradation; Panel data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we examine the effects of green finance and environmental degradation on sustainable development in developing countries. Using a panel dataset for 42 developing countries from 2000 to 2020, we find that green finance has a positive and significant impact on sustainable development, while environmental degradation has a negative and significant impact. These results are robust and have implications for policymakers and regulators. Our findings can inform the design of policies related to green financing and investment in developing nations.
In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of green finance and environmental degradation on sustainable development in developing countries. We use a panel dataset for 42 developing countries for the 2000-2020 period employing the panel fixed effect estimation. Adjusted net savings are used to measure sustainable development, green credit, green securities, and green investments are applied as proxies for green finance, and carbon (CO2) emissions are used to indicate environmental degradation. The analysis reveals that green finance has a positive and significant impact, whereas environmental degradation exerts a negative and significant impact on sustainable development in developing countries. Further, we find the same outcomes by employing the system-generalized method of moments estimation, confirming the robustness of our results. Our study has implications for regulators and policymakers seeking to achieve sustainable development in developing coun-tries. Our findings will be useful for designing policies related to green financing and investment in developing nations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据