4.2 Article

Early years education teachers' perceptions of nature of science

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION
卷 45, 期 8, 页码 613-635

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2023.2168139

关键词

Nature of Science (NOS); Reconceptualised Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science (RFN); science education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that teachers' lacking understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) can impact their instructional decisions and students' understanding. This study investigated UAE early years' science teachers' perceptions of NOS. Results from a questionnaire revealed that teachers have adequate understanding in many aspects of science and NOS, but varied perceptions were found on key concepts such as bias, scientific practices, and politics' influence. Misconceptions regarding NOS were also identified. The findings have implications for teaching and suggest a need for further research.
Research indicates that teachers lack a sophisticated understanding of Nature of Science (NOS), which in turn, can impact their instructional decisions and students' understanding of NOS. The aim of the study was to investigate United Arab Emirates (UAE) early years' science teacher's (N = 433) perceptions about the NOS. Results obtained from a 70-item questionnaire revealed that teachers have an adequate understanding on many aspects related to science and NOS, especially those pertaining to the 'Social-Institutional', 'Scientific Practices' and 'Educational Applications' categories. However, varied perceptions were found on some key concepts such as the role of bias and prejudices on scienti?c facts, the employment of same scientific practices across different branches of science, and the influence of politics in science. Misconceptions on particular aspects of NOS were also recognised (e.g. the distinction between laws and theories and the fixed nature of procedures followed in experiments). The findings suggest practical and pedagogical implications for teaching and outline an agenda for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据