4.2 Review

Involvement of Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Youths in Behavioral Type 1 Diabetes Interventions: A Systematic Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 428-447

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad018

关键词

diabetes; health disparities and inequities; psychosocial intervention; race; ethnicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review examined the inclusion of racially/ethnically minoritized (REM) youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in psychosocial interventions. The review found that while some studies included REM youth, only one study specifically examined the impact of interventions on REM youth or reducing racial/ethnic disparities. Further research and practice implications are discussed.
Objective Psychosocial interventions targeting glycemic health in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have been promising. Nonetheless, disparities in T1D treatment and outcomes are pervasive among racially/ethnically minoritized (REM) youth and a systematic review examining the inclusion of REM youth in psychosocial interventions is lacking. Therefore, the present systematic review examined the literature to determine the inclusion of REM youth with T1D in psychosocial interventions. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines for psychosocial intervention studies of youth (<19 years) with T1D between 2011 and 2022 using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and MedLine. Tables of contents for JPP, CPPP, and Diabetes Care were also reviewed. The date last searched was April 26, 2022. Studies were examined for risk of bias using the QualSyst rating system. Results Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 3,117 participants. Studies utilized various psychological interventions (e.g., CBT, MI, behavioral modalities). Seventeen studies reported participants' race/ethnicity and eleven studies included >20% REM youth. Conclusions One study examined the impact of interventions on REM youth or whether the intervention reduces existing racial/ethnic disparities. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据