4.5 Review

Filamentous fungi in artisanal cheeses: A problem to be avoided or a market opportunity?

期刊

HELIYON
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15110

关键词

Mould; Mycobiota; Fermented food; Food safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microbial diversity of artisanal cheeses, particularly the detection and identification of fungi on cheese rinds, has been extensively studied. The composition and abundance of fungi on cheese surfaces can greatly impact sensory qualities, defects, ripening, and mycotoxin risks. This review critically discusses the influence of fungi on artisanal cheese quality and the potential for producers to exploit their presence for innovative products with greater added value. These discussions are important for the future commercialization and regulation of artisanal cheeses with high abundance of molds.
The microbial diversity of artisanal cheeses has been ever more extensively explored over recent years. Many new studies have been particularly focused on the detection and identification of fungi associated with cheese rinds. This is not surprising given that the composition and abun-dance of fungi on the cheese surface can significantly contribute to desirable sensory qualities, while also contributing to defects, particularly during ripening, and risks associated with the production of mycotoxins. Here we critically review the impact of fungi on the quality of artisanal cheeses, as well as the risks associated with the presence of particular species or strains with specific phenotypes. Ultimately, we address the question; should fungi be predominantly considered villains when it comes to artisanal cheese safety or could their presence be better exploited by producers in order to generate innovative products with greater added value? Such discussions will be increasingly important from the perspective of the future commercialization and regulation of artisanal cheeses that frequently contain a high abundance of moulds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据