4.5 Article

Z-scheme NiO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites prepared using phyto-mediated nickel nanoparticles for the efficient photocatalytic degradation

期刊

HELIYON
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16232

关键词

NiO NPs; Photocatalysis; Photodegradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a highly-effective photocatalyst, NiO/g-C3N4, was successfully synthesized using phyto-mediated-synthesized nickel nanoparticles. The results showed that the composite with 10%wt. nickel content exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity, with degradation efficiencies of 95% for Rhodamine B and 98% for tetracycline.
Highly-effective photocatalyst of NiO/g-C3N4 with was successfully synthesized by using phyto-mediated-synthesized nickel nanoparticles. The preparation was initiated by synthesizing nickel nanoparticles by using Tinosphora cordifolia stem extract under ultrasound-assisted method fol-lowed by the dispersing onto g-C3N4 structure. The study focused on physicochemical charac-terization and photocatalytic activity as function of the percentage of Ni in the nanocomposite. The photocatalytic activity examinations were carried out to rhodamine B and tetracycline photocatalytic oxidation. The results demonstrated that graphitic carbon nitride is effectively improved the photocatalytic activity of NiO for both photocatalytic oxidation reactions. From the varied Ni content of 5; 10; and 20 %wt., it was also found that the highest photoactivity was achieved by the composite having 10 %wt. of nickel content. The high effectivity was showed by degradation efficiency of 95% toward Rhodamine B and 98% toward tetracycline. The exami-nation on effect of scavengers suggests that Z-scheme involved in the photocatalytic mechanism which facilitated the efficient separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs under visible light illumination. In summary, the present findings provide a green approach for fabricating the effective photocatalysts for organic contaminant degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据