4.7 Article

Geographic and demographic variation in worry about extreme heat and COVID-19 risk in summer 2020

期刊

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102876

关键词

Extreme heat; COVID-19; Risk perception; Survey research; MRP; Health disparities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the worry of the U.S. public about the risks of extreme heat and COVID-19 during the summer of 2020. The research finds that worry varies across states and demographic groups, reflecting disparities in the impact of each risk. There is a need to address inequalities in heat risk and protect the most vulnerable populations in the face of climate change.
Extreme heat is a major health hazard that is exacerbated by ongoing human-caused climate change. However, how populations perceive the risks of heat in the context of other hazards like COVID-19, and how perceptions vary geographically, are not well understood. Here we present spatially explicit estimates of worry among the U. S. public about the risks of heat and COVID-19 during the summer of 2020, using nationally representative survey data and a multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) model. Worry about extreme heat and COVID-19 varies both across states and across demographic groups, in ways that reflect disparities in the impact of each risk. Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino populations, who face greater health impacts from both COVID-19 and extreme heat due to institutional and societal inequalities, also tend to be much more worried about both risks than white, non-Hispanic populations. Worry about heat and COVID-19 were correlated at the individual and population level, and patterns tended to be related to underlying external factors associated with the risk environment. In the face of a changing climate there is an urgent need to address disparities in heat risk and develop responses that ensure the most at-risk populations are protected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据