4.7 Article

Examining the effects of authenticity fit and association fit: A digital human avatar endorsement model

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103230

关键词

Digital human avatar endorsement; Avatar-product fit; Authenticity fit; Association fit; Hedonic product; Utilitarian product

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the extensive use of digital human avatar (DHA) endorsement has emerged. The fit between a fake virtual image and a real product is crucial for the success of DHA endorsement. Based on cue consistency theory, this study found that consumers generate positive attitudes toward DHA endorsement when there is a fit between a DHA and a real product. The results also showed that authenticity fit and association fit have significant positive impacts on consumer attitudes toward DHA endorsement, with varying influences depending on the product type.
In recent years, the extensive use of digital human avatar (DHA) endorsement has emerged. DHA endorsement often entails the use of real products, e.g., wearing real clothes, which raises the issue of the fit between a fake virtual image and a real product. Whether consumers feel a positive attitude toward this kind of fit is the basis of whether DHA endorsement can be successful. Accordingly, based on cue consistency theory, we infer that consumers generate positive attitudes toward DHA endorsement when there is a fit between a DHA and a real product. We therefore developed a DHA endorsement model to explain the antecedents and consequences of avatar-product fit, decomposing fit type into authenticity fit and association fit. Two tests were used to verify this model. Their results show that authenticity fit and association fit have significant positive impacts on consumer attitudes toward DHA endorsement. Furthermore, the influences of these two paths vary by product. For hedonic products, authenticity fit has a greater impact on attitudes; for utilitarian products, association fit is a more influential factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据