4.7 Article

Interconnectedness and extreme risk: Evidence from dual banking systems

期刊

ECONOMIC MODELLING
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106150

关键词

Dual banking systems; Islamic banks; Conventional banks; Banking network; Interconnectedness; Extreme risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the interconnectedness between Islamic and conventional banks and their transmission of extreme risks. The heterogeneous structure of dual banking systems raises concerns about systemic stability. Using panel data from 20 Islamic and 34 conventional banks in six GCC member countries, we define extreme risk as the transmission of tail risk across banks from 2007 to 2021. Our findings indicate a tight connectivity that significantly increases during periods of instability. We also analyze the topological structure of interconnectedness between Islamic and conventional banks, revealing significant unidirectional and bidirectional spillovers of extreme risk at different levels.
This study examines the interconnection structure of Islamic and conventional banks and how they transmit extreme risks to each other. This appears to be a particular problem because of the heterogeneous structure of dual banking systems, which raises major questions about systemic stability. We define extreme risk by the transmission of tail risk across banks for a panel of 20 Islamic and 34 conventional banks in six GCC member countries with dual banking systems over the period 2007-2021. Our results reveal the existence of tight connectivity, which increases significantly during periods of instability. We also provide an analysis of the topological structure of the interconnectedness of Islamic and conventional banks that suggests significant unidirectional and bidirectional spillovers of extreme risk at the inter-and intra-sectoral and bilateral country levels. Finally, by examining the individual systemic relevance, we find that there is an asymmetric effect of extreme risk spillovers between conventional and Islamic banks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据