4.8 Review

Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A systematic review of empirical research in crop production

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122374

关键词

Technology acceptance; Systematic review; Smart agriculture; Crop farming; Prediction; Decision support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smart agriculture enables the analysis of agricultural data on a large scale, leading to improved productivity and sustainability. However, achieving this potential requires understanding the factors that affect technology acceptance in smart agriculture, which is complex and often poorly understood.
Smart agriculture offers the potential to analyse agricultural data at a scale not previously possible. Researchers argue that the combination of rich data and intelligent decision support has the potential to improve productivity and profitability in agriculture, whilst also improving sustainability. We argue that achieving this potential re-quires not just on technological advancement, it also requires a detailed understanding of factors that impact technology acceptance in smart agriculture. Acceptance is necessary if technical advances are to translate into real-world impact. However, technology acceptance is complex and often poorly understood. This systematic review focuses on technology acceptance in prediction and decision support systems in crop production. Major databases were searched to identify papers that formally address technology acceptance and include detailed data. 16 papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Common facilitators and barriers are identified, and papers are mapping against the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. This analysis showed that constructs including perceived effectiveness are addressed frequently, but others such as opportu-nity costs and burden have received less attention. The findings suggest the necessity for greater application of formal methods and the need for standardized, domain-specific methods to support this assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据