4.4 Article

How New Ideas Diffuse in Science

期刊

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 522-561

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00031224231166955

关键词

sociology of science; sociology of ideas; science of science; sociology of knowledge; innovation; diffusion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the factors that enable the diffusion and integration of novel intellectual contributions into scientific work. It finds that new ideas spread more widely when they resonate socially and intellectually, and become core concepts of science when they are associated with prominent ideas and fit with existing research traditions. The social conditions play a decisive role in the later stages of an idea's career.
What conditions enable novel intellectual contributions to diffuse and become integrated into later scientific work? Prior work tends to focus on whole cultural products, such as patents and articles, and emphasizes external social factors as important. This article focuses on concepts as reflections of ideas, and we identify the combined influence that social factors and internal intellectual structures have on ideational diffusion. To develop this perspective, we use computational techniques to identify nearly 60,000 new ideas introduced over two decades (1993 to 2016) in the Web of Science and follow their diffusion across 38 million later publications. We find new ideas diffuse more widely when they socially and intellectually resonate. New ideas become core concepts of science when they reach expansive networks of unrelated authors, achieve consistent intellectual usage, are associated with other prominent ideas, and fit with extant research traditions. These ecological conditions play an increasingly decisive role later in an idea's career, after their relations with the environment are established. This work advances the systematic study of scientific ideas by moving beyond products to focus on the content of ideas themselves and applies a relational perspective that takes seriously the contingency of their success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据