4.5 Article

No Differences in Auditory Steady-State Responses in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typically Developing Children

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-05907-w

关键词

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Gamma-band; Inter-Trial Coherence (ITC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) as a biomarker for abnormal auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The findings showed no significant differences in ASSR between ASD and typically developing (TD) children, suggesting that ASSR is not a reliable biomarker for abnormal auditory processing in ASD. Additionally, the previously observed atypical double-frequency somatosensory response in ASD did not apply to the auditory modality, indicating that abnormal local connectivity in ASD may not be modality-independent.
Auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has been studied as a potential biomarker for abnormal auditory sensory processing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with mixed results. Motivated by prior somatosensory findings of group differences in inter-trial coherence (ITC) between ASD and typically developing (TD) individuals at twice the steady-state stimulation frequency, we examined ASSR at 25 and 50 as well as 43 and 86 Hz in response to 25-Hz and 43-Hz auditory stimuli, respectively, using magnetoencephalography. Data were recorded from 22 ASD and 31 TD children, ages 6-17 years. ITC measures showed prominent ASSRs at the stimulation and double frequencies, without significant group differences. These results do not support ASSR as a robust ASD biomarker of abnormal auditory processing in ASD. Furthermore, the previously observed atypical double-frequency somatosensory response in ASD did not generalize to the auditory modality. Thus, the hypothesis about modality-independent abnormal local connectivity in ASD was not supported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据