4.5 Article

Filled Pauses Produced by Autistic Adults Differ in Prosodic Realisation, but not Rate or Lexical Type

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-06000-y

关键词

Autism spectrum disorder; Filled pause; Hesitation; Prosody; Conversation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the use of filled pauses in conversations between autistic and non-autistic adults and found no significant differences in the rate and lexical type of filled pauses between the two groups. However, there was a distinct group-level difference in the intonational realization, with non-autistic participants demonstrating a higher proportion of filled pauses with the canonical level pitch contour. This study provides valuable insights into the conversational use of filled pauses in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and sets the stage for future investigations.
We examined the use of filled pauses in conversations between homogeneous pairs of autistic and non-autistic adults. A corpus of semi-spontaneous speech was used to analyse the rate, lexical type (nasal uhm or non-nasal uh), and prosodic realisation (rising, level or falling) of filled pauses. We used Bayesian modelling for statistical analysis. We found an identical rate of filled pauses and an equivalent preference of uhm over uh across groups, but also a robust group-level difference regarding the intonational realisation of filled pauses: non-autistic controls produced a considerably higher proportion of filled pause tokens realised with the canonical level pitch contour than autistic speakers. Despite the fact that filled pauses are a frequent and impactful part of speech, previous work on their conversational use in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is limited. Our account is the first to analyse the intonational realisation of filled pauses in ASD and the first to investigate conversations between autistic adults in this context. Our results on rate and lexical type can help to contextualise previous research, while the novel findings on intonational realisation set the stage for future investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据