4.7 Article

The roles of innovation strategy and founding team diversity in new venture growth

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113653

关键词

Start -up; Team diversity; Innovation; Imprinting; fsQCA

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses fsQCA to examine how venture strategy, founding team knowledge diversity, and demographic diversity interact to explain revenue growth of new ventures. Based on a longitudinal dataset of 210 new ventures, we find that the effects of team diversity are complex, with different conditions explaining short-term and sustained growth, contingent on the venture's strategy. We identify different recipes for short-term and long-term revenue growth, suggesting the potential role of imprinting and an innovation strategy. The findings provide insights into the relative relevance of innovation strategy, knowledge diversity, and demographic diversity at distinct stages of venture founding.
Using fsQCA, this study explores how venture strategy, as well as founding team knowledge diversity and demographic diversity interact to explain revenue growth of new ventures. Based on a longitudinal dataset containing 210 new ventures, we find that the effects of team diversity are complex such that different diversity conditions explain short-term (i.e. one year) compared to sustained growth (i.e. over three years) and that their role is contingent on the venture's strategy. We identify three recipes that explain revenue growth in the shortterm and four recipes that explain revenue growth in the longer-term. One recipe is the same for both time periods pointing towards the potential role of imprinting of certain team diversity conditions in combination with an innovation strategy. Our findings provide a nuanced and in-depth picture of the relative relevance of an innovation strategy, knowledge diversity, and demographic diversity at distinct stages of venture founding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据