4.7 Article

A case study of interdisciplinary thematic learning curriculum to cultivate 4C skills

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811

关键词

interdisciplinary thematic learning; critical thinking; communication; creativity; collaboration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity are essential skills for students in the 21st century. Interdisciplinary thematic learning, focused on real-world challenges, can effectively foster these skills. This study examined the development of students' 4C skills through problem-solving tasks related to visual disaster weather, and found that the interdisciplinary thematic learning environment promotes creative thinking, group communication, collaboration, and critical thinking.
Critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity are four fundamental skills for students in the 21st century, indicating the way for nurturing talents required for future social development. Interdisciplinary thematic learning has become an important educational carrier for 4C Skills training, with its connotation coinciding with the training requirements of 4C Skills. Few academics, however, have looked into interdisciplinary thematic learning activities based on real-world problems. In this study, using a middle school in Xiamen, Fujian Province as an example, 32 s-year students in middle school were given several problem-solving tasks relevant to visual disaster weather. Based on test coding and questionnaire evaluation, class notes, course videos, student solutions, and interview texts, we examined the development of students' 4C skills through real-world problem-based interdisciplinary thematic learning activities. This study discovered that an interdisciplinary thematic learning environment centered on real-world challenges fosters students' creative thinking in open practice while also encouraging group communication and collaboration. Students also gain critical thinking skills through questioning and critique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据