4.4 Article

The application of graphene/h-BN metamaterial in medical linear accelerators for reducing neutron leakage in the treatment room

期刊

PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 1023-1032

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01269-w

关键词

Graphene; h-BN; Linac; Treatment room; Neutron shielding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrons can be generated in medical linear accelerators, posing a biological risk to patients and workers. Using graphene/hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) metamaterial as a neutron shielding material can effectively reduce neutron transmission from the treatment room and improve photon spectrum quality.
Neutrons can be generated in medical linear accelerators (Linac) due to the interaction of high-energy photons (> 10 MeV) with the components of the accelerator head. The generated photoneutrons may penetrate the treatment room if a suitable neutron shield is not used. This causes a biological risk to the patient and occupational workers. The use of appropriate materials in the barriers surrounding the bunker may be effective in preventing the transmission of neutrons from the treatment room to the outside. In addition, neutrons are present in the treatment room due to leakage in the Linac's head. This study aims to reduce the transmission of neutrons from the treatment room by using graphene/hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) metamaterial as a neutron shielding material. MCNPX code was used to model three layers of graphene/h-BN metamaterial around the target and other components of the linac, and to investigate its effect on the photon spectrum and photoneutrons. Results indicate that the first layer of a graphene/h-BN metamaterial shield around the target improves photon spectrum quality at low energies, whereas the second and third layers have no significant effect. Regarding neutrons, three layers of the metamaterial results in a 50% reduction in the number of neutrons in the air within the treatment room.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据