4.7 Article

A Luteolin-Loaded Electrospun Fibrous Implantable Device for Potential Therapy of Gout Attacks

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR BIOSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1598-1609

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201600123

关键词

electrospun; gout; implantable device; luteolin; recurrent attacks

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB933600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50773065, 51373138, 21574105]
  3. Research fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120184110029]
  4. Youth scientific research and Cultivation Fund at Tibet University [ZDPJZK201407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recurrence of acute gout attacks remains an unsolved problem in clinical therapy. In order to tackle this problem, poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL)/gelatin composite fibrous devices loaded with luteolin are presented via electrospinning for the therapy of gout and its recurrence. The luteolin-loaded fibrous device has the capability of inhibiting metabolic activities and reducing inflammation-associated cytokine productions (TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6) that are secreted by lipopolysaccharide stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. The device can also suppress the reaction activities of xanthine oxidase for 7 d in vitro. In vivo, acute gout model is established by injecting monosodium urate (MSU) crystals into New Zealand rabbits' knees, then the luteolin-loaded PCL/gelatin (5: 5) nanofiber device is implanted near the gout sites. The results show that the device can alleviate the acute gouty arthritis. In the mean time, the luteolin-loaded PCL fiber device with a longer drug release profile is implanted in a recurrent gout model, which is constructed by injecting MSU crystals into rabbits' knees three times. The results on day 21 reveal that this device has the potential to overcome the recurrence of gout. Therefore, the drug-loaded polymer fiber device can be an inspiration for potential gout therapy to overcome recurrent attacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据