4.5 Article

Uptake Routes and Biodistribution of Polystyrene Nanoplastics on Zebrafish Larvae and Toxic Effects on Development

期刊

FISHES
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes8030168

关键词

marine litter; Danio rerio; ROS; apoptosis; receptor STRA6; receptor Adgrg6; receptor CNTN4; APLP2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polystyrene (PS) is a widely used plastic polymer, mainly for disposable products. Due to its resistance to degradation, PS can remain in the environment for a long time. This study found that nanoplastics made of amino-modified polystyrene (nPS-NH2) could bioaccumulate in the head, especially in the eyes, after being internalized. Moreover, their interaction with receptors could lead to oxidative stress and apoptosis in the bioaccumulated regions. This study confirms the danger of nanoplastic wastes released into the environment.
Polystyrene (PS) is the most widely used plastic polymer. It is mainly used to produce disposable products. Due to its resistance to degradation, PS can remain in the environment for a long time. Its mechanical, physical and biological actions determine the release of smaller fragments, which are able to penetrate organisms and accumulate in target organs. Fertilized Danio rerio eggs were exposed to concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/L of fluorescent, amino-modified polystyrene nanoplastics (nPS-NH2) with diameters of 100 and 50 nm for 96h, according to OECD guidelines (2013). Uptake, biodistribution, toxicity, oxidative stress and apoptosis were evaluated; moreover, we carried out a simulation to study the interactions between nPS-NH2 and defined regions of three receptors: STRA6, Adgrg6 and CNTN4/APLP2. We demonstrated that after being internalized, nPS-NH2 could reach the head and bioaccumulate, especially in the eyes. Moreover, they could lead to oxidative stress and apoptosis in the several regions where they bioaccumulated due to their interaction with receptors. This study confirmed the danger of nanoplastic wastes released in the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据