4.5 Article

Short and Long-Term Effects of Early and Late Weaning on Atlantic Cod, Gadus morhua

期刊

FISHES
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes8060312

关键词

early and late weaning; long-term effect; Artemia nauplii; Atlantic cod

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have shown the negative short-term effects of early weaning on finfish larvae, but the information on its long-term effects on growth and economic loss is lacking. This study evaluated the short- and long-term effects of early weaning and late weaning on Atlantic cod, and found that late weaned fish showed significantly higher body weight at 30 months post-hatch compared to early weaned fish. A cost analysis indicated substantial financial benefit for commercial cod farming by using late weaning. Thus, it is recommended to use late weaning in order to gain considerable economic profit.
Studies have shown negative short-term effects of early weaning (EW) in finfish larvae but information on long-term effects of EW on growth and subsequent economic loss is lacking. We evaluated the short- and long-term effects of EW and late weaning (LW) on Atlantic cod. Cod larvae were fed with enriched rotifers from 2 to 35 days post-hatch (dph) and weaning carried out from 21 to 35 dph (EW) or with enriched rotifers from 2 to 29 dph followed by enriched Artemia nauplii from 25 to 56 dph and weaning carried out from 45 to 56 dph (LW). At 190 dph, 50 fish from each tank were tagged with an electronic tag and were transferred to sea cages at 10 months old. At the end of 30 months post-hatch, the weight of the fish was recorded. Our results showed a significant short-term effect of the weaning method on the growth of Atlantic cod at 65 dph, but no significant difference at 90 and 190 dph. However, fish from LW showed a significantly higher body weight compared to fish from EW at 30 months post-hatch. A cost analysis indicated substantial benefit for commercial cod farming by using LW and we recommend using LW to gain sizable financial benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据