4.3 Article

Incidence of concussion and associated risk factors in collegiate soccer: findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE consortium

期刊

SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN FOOTBALL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2023.2227134

关键词

concussion; soccer; sex; college; athlete

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective cohort study examines concussion incidence rates in collegiate soccer players and compares rates based on various risk factors. Results show that females have a higher risk of concussion than males, especially during games and practices. The risk of concussion is higher during games compared to practice, and lower in Division III compared to Divisions I and II.
This retrospective cohort study aims to examine concussion incidence rates (IR) in collegiate soccer players and compare IRs based on risk factors including sex, competition level, games/practices, history of concussion, and playing position. Collegiate soccer players were recruited (n = 2,471) from 23 institutions from the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium. Incidence rates for concussion per 1000 athlete exposures (AEs) were calculated across the 2015-16/2016-17 seasons. Incidence rates (IR) comparing risk factor groups were also calculated. A total of 162 concussions occurred during the study, for an IR of 0.08/1000 AEs. Females were more likely to have a concussion than males overall (IR = 1.47) and were more likely to have a concussion in games (IR = 1.42) and practices (IR = 2.91). Concussions were more likely during competition compared to practice (IR = 2.53), and less likely in Division III, compared to Divisions I and II, & chi;(2) = 6.5, p > .05. In the concussed group, male sex was associated with 2.47 times higher odds of playing defender and 2.29 times higher odds of a collision mechanism. Results confirm previous findings that females and game exposures have higher concussion IR than males and practice exposures. Findings also supported sex differences in IRs based on exposure type, position, and mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据