4.5 Article

The immunoglobulin G1N-glycan composition affects binding to each low affinity Fc receptor

期刊

MABS
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 1512-1524

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1218586

关键词

CD16; CD32; CD64; FcRIII; FcRII; FcRI; N-glycosylation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-GM115489]
  2. Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Molecular Biology at Iowa State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) is the most abundant circulating human antibody and also the scaffold for many therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The destruction of IgG-coated targets by cell-mediated pathways begins with an interaction between the IgG Fc region and multiple varieties of membrane-bound Fc receptors (FcRs) on the surface of leukocytes. This interaction requires the presence of an asparagine-linked (N-)glycan on the Fc, and variations in the N-glycan composition can affect the affinity of CD16A binding (an FcR). Contemporary efforts to glycoengineer mAbs focus on increasing CD16A affinity, and thus treatment efficacy, but it is unclear how these changes affect affinity for the other FcRs. Here, we measure binding of the extracellular Fc-binding domains for human CD16A and B, CD32A, B and C, and CD64 to 6 well-defined IgG1 Fc glycoforms that cover approximate to 85% of the pool of human IgG1 Fc glycoforms. Core 1-6 fucosylation showed the greatest changes with CD16B (8.5-fold decrease), CD16A (3.9-fold decrease) and CD32B/C (1.8-fold decrease), but did not affect binding to CD32A. Adding galactose to the non-reducing termini of the complex-type, biantennary glycan increased affinity for all CD16s and 32s tested by 1.7-fold. Sialylation did not change the affinity of core-fucosylated Fc, but increased the affinity of afucosylated Fc slightly by an average of 1.16-fold for all CD16s and CD32s tested. The effects of fucose and galactose modification are additive, suggesting the contributions of these residues to Fc receptor affinity are independent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据