4.7 Article

A Comparative Analysis of the Grafting Efficiency of Watermelon with a Grafting Machine

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9050600

关键词

watermelon; grafting efficiency; grafting machine; one-cotyledon grafting; comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aging rural population in China and the labor-intensive nature of grafting have led to a decrease in the number of grafters and an increase in their wages. Manual grafting is unable to meet the growing demand for watermelon-grafted transplanting, thus machine grafting is proposed as an effective alternative. A comparative analysis was conducted between an automatic grafting machine and traditional hand grafting to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of machine grafting.
The rising age of the population in rural China and the labor intensity of grafting have resulted in a decrease in the number of grafters and a subsequent increase in their wages. Manual grafting can no longer satisfy the increasing demand for watermelon-grafted transplanting; thus, machine grafting will be an effective alternative. In order to accelerate the implementation of machine grafting in China, a comparative analysis between the automatic grafting machine (model 2TJGQ-800) and traditional hand grafting was conducted. The reliability and feasibility of machine grafting were evaluated through a comprehensive evaluation of the production capacity and grafting seedling quality. This study focuses on the grafting application of watermelon plug-tray seedlings. The scion and rootstock seeds were sown on 9 November 2022. Grafting experiments using an automatic grafting machine, skilled workers, and ordinary workers were conducted with the rootpruned one-cotyledon grafting method on 24 November 2022. The results showed that the machine grafting had a high uniformity and grafting speed. The grafting speed of the grafting machine was 774 plant center dot h(-1) and 1.65-2.55-fold higher than the hand grafting. With training, workers can improve their grafting speed, but it will still be slower than machine grafting. In addition, there was no significant difference in the grafting survival rate between the machine grafting and hand grafting. However, using machine grafting, the success rate decreased from 100% to 90.07% and the rootstock regrowth rate increased from 18.44% to 72.69%. Incomplete rootstock cutting, clip supply failure, and grafting drop failure are the three main factors that result in machine grafting failure. In conclusion, the grafting machine has advantages in terms of grafting speed and uniformity. Upon improving the accuracy of the cutting mechanism and grafting success rate, it will be adopted by commercial nurseries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据